<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Self-Definition Easier Today?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vertegram.com/conscious-living/is-self-definition-easier-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vertegram.com/conscious-living/is-self-definition-easier-today/</link>
	<description>For self development addicts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:09:57 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: teodora</title>
		<link>http://www.vertegram.com/conscious-living/is-self-definition-easier-today/comment-page-1/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>teodora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vertegram.com/conscious-living/is-self-definition-easier-today/#comment-901</guid>
		<description>My point (in reply to the quote above) was that the existence of  multifunctional things are not new. The &quot;things have no definition now&quot; thing is not new either, it&#039;s not derived from the ipod. So imo the question of self-definition is the same as in the past (in reply to &quot;is it easier?&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point (in reply to the quote above) was that the existence of  multifunctional things are not new. The &#8220;things have no definition now&#8221; thing is not new either, it&#8217;s not derived from the ipod. So imo the question of self-definition is the same as in the past (in reply to &#8220;is it easier?&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attila Borcsa</title>
		<link>http://www.vertegram.com/conscious-living/is-self-definition-easier-today/comment-page-1/#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>Attila Borcsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vertegram.com/conscious-living/is-self-definition-easier-today/#comment-900</guid>
		<description>Whether I don&#039;t get your point, or you don&#039;t get mine. This post is by far not a statement. The example with the mobile was an &lt;strong&gt;analogy&lt;/strong&gt;, as you yourself are trying to give one with the egg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether I don&#8217;t get your point, or you don&#8217;t get mine. This post is by far not a statement. The example with the mobile was an <strong>analogy</strong>, as you yourself are trying to give one with the egg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teodora</title>
		<link>http://www.vertegram.com/conscious-living/is-self-definition-easier-today/comment-page-1/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>teodora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vertegram.com/conscious-living/is-self-definition-easier-today/#comment-898</guid>
		<description>Why would self-definition mean having a one-track mind? People always had many roles and activities and qualities at once. I don&#039;t think technology makes any difference here. E.g. an egg can be a bird, an omlette, or a political statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would self-definition mean having a one-track mind? People always had many roles and activities and qualities at once. I don&#8217;t think technology makes any difference here. E.g. an egg can be a bird, an omlette, or a political statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
